Pushing Boundaries
" Art is always a kind of theatre."
Damien Hirst
The art world has been boldly pushing boundaries through out history, and it would seem some artists were born to make an impact, challenge our societal norms, politics, and the public’s sense of morality. Some art was created to provoke admiration, while others spark intense debate, censorship, or outright outrage. Let’s take a look at a few of the worlds controversial pieces of art in recent times.
Damien Hurst, ‘For The Love Of God’, 2007
What could be so controversial about a skull covered in crystals? Damien Hirst’s “For the Love of God” is a platinum cast of an 18th Century human skull encrusted with over 8,000 (8,601 to be exact) flawless diamonds. This includes a striking pear-shaped pink diamond placed on the forehead that is known as the Skull Star Diamond. This audacious piece cost £12 million to produce, and Hirst claimed to have sold it for £50 million in 2007 to an anonymous buyer. However it was later revealed in 2022 by Hirst himself that he, along with White Cube gallery and those undisclosed buyers, own it causing a lot of questions, confusion and controversy.
The price of production alone is seen as a critique of gross wealth, mortality, and the commodification of art. While some praised it as a thought-provoking statement about the diamond industry, others found it excessively materialistic and offensive, seeing it as Hirst’s attempt to capitalize on sensationalism and the elite art market. The piece addresses the relationship between art and commerce, sparking debates on whether it challenges the commercialization of art or merely exemplifies it.
Marcus Harvey, ‘Myra,’ 1995
The name Myra Hindley may drum up discomfort for most. For those of you reading who are unfamiliar with that name, Myra Hindley is a serial killer of children, murders she committed in partnership with boyfriend Ian Brady in the 1960’s, infamously known as the Moors Murders. And now the portrait subject for British artist Marcus Harvey’s ‘Myra’. Some would say that in itself is a risqué topic. Well, there is a darker twist to this piece.
Harvey created this portrait entirely from black, grey and white painted hand prints of children. Interesting choice.
Displayed at the Royal Academy of Art in London, unsurprisingly the portrait received harsh backlash from the public, many of whom viewed it as a glorification of a criminal. The painting’s inclusion led to protests and even vandalism, as outraged viewers felt it was insensitive to the victims’ families. ‘Myra’ challenges the idea of what is morally permissible in art, especially when dealing with sensitive topics like murder and violence. It questions the line between artistic expression and respect for public sentiment.
Fun fact: In 2022 a limited edition print of the artwork was destroyed with a paintball gun on ‘Jimmy Carr Destroys Art’ following an audience vote.
Andreas Serrano, ‘Piss Christ’, 1987
Andres Serrano’s “Piss Christ” is a photograph of a crucifix submerged in a glass of liquid. The liquid being, as you may have already guessed, the artist’s urine. This provocative image ignited outrage from religious groups and conservative leaders, who viewed it as a disrespectful affront to Christianity. Although the piece was intended as a commentary on the commercialization and degradation of religious symbols, it drew ire for what was seen as blasphemy. Controversy surrounding “Piss Christ” intensified as it was partially funded by a U.S. government grant, leading to a national debate on public funding for art. Serrano said of the back lash: “I had no idea Piss Christ would get the attention it did, since I meant neither blasphemy nor offence by it. I’ve been a Catholic all my life, so I am a follower of Christ.”
The artwork sparked questions about religious sensitivity, freedom of expression, and government involvement in the arts. Serrano’s piece has became emblematic of the “culture wars” over the boundaries of artistic freedom.
All in all it comes as no surprise that art holds the enduring power to provoke, challenge, and question societal norms, and we have barely skimmed the surface with these three examples. From moral concerns to political provocations, each piece pushes viewers to confront uncomfortable truths, reconsider established beliefs, or spark debate over the purpose of art itself.
Art is such a personal experience, so while you might find something offensive, it could mean nothing to someone else. It’s ability to disrupt and inspire has made it one of the most resilient and influential forms of human expression, shaping cultural conversations across generations. Today, these once-controversial works are studied as milestones in art history, serving as reminders of art’s ability to challenge conventions and expand perspectives.
Get Creative Today
Of course a great way to get a monthly dose of new inspiration is a subscription to ScrawlrBox.
Subscribe today and join our wonderful Scrawlr Community.